Effects of Anthrax essays

Effects of Anthrax essays It seems like now a day there is tragedies, attacks, and new diseases that spring up constantly. Most recently, the American nation is plagued by a deadly epidemic Anthrax. Anthrax is a topic that is all over the newspapers, magazines, and television, but common people know very little of Anthraxs causes and effects. There are many myths and stories that are spread through rumors and false information. All people and especially those near at risk areas must be informed about the truth of Anthrax. Anthrax is a disease that is formed from a deadly bacterium that originates most commonly in dead animals, but unfortunately it can also be developed and produced in highly sophisticated labotories and scientific environments of that nature. Anthrax is being widely distributed in the United States of America through postal offices and governmental work areas. Not only do all people need to know about cures and vaccinations of this disease, but also background information and knowledge of this deadly disease must be widely distributed to give all people an understanding and precaution of this lethal and easily infected illness. The lethal bacterium, Bacillus anthracis, which causes the disease Anthrax, was not discovered until 1959. Anthrax can appear in humans and animals alike. It was first discovered in mysterious dead animals. At first, scientists believed that this bacterium, Bacillus anthracis, blocked the capillaries, which furthermore resulted in death. Through many experiments and observations, scientists discovered that blocked capillaries did not cause death, but the deadly and dangerous exotoxin released by Anthrax. This toxin is extremely deadly and lethal. The cause of death from this Anthrax toxin is due to lack of oxygen, respiratory shock and failure, secondary shock, cardiac arrest, and an increase of vascular permeability. Anthrax can be contracted in three different ways. First and most dea...

Word Choice Inalienable vs. Unalienable (An Independence Day Special)

Word Choice Inalienable vs. Unalienable (An Independence Day Special) Word Choice: Inalienable vs. Unalienable (An Independence Day Special) Happy Independence Day! To celebrate, we’re looking at a controversy related to the founding of the United States: the word â€Å"unalienable,† which appears in the Declaration of Independence. This isn’t a spelling we really use anymore, though, with â€Å"inalienable† much more common. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. So what is the difference between these terms? Why does the Declaration of Independence use â€Å"unalienable†? And when should you use each spelling? The Meaning of Inalienable and Unalienable First, let’s look at the difference in meaning between these words There isn’t one. Nada. Zilch. No difference at all. â€Å"Inalienable† and â€Å"unalienable† both mean â€Å"can’t be taken away.† So whether we speak of â€Å"inalienable rights† or â€Å"unalienable rights,† we mean rights that can’t be denied. In practice, then, the only difference is that â€Å"inalienable† is now much more common. Different Drafts, Different Spellings So, why does the Declaration of Independence use â€Å"unalienable†? Spelling variants were common at the time, and â€Å"unalienable† was the most common version of this term at the time. It also enjoyed a spike in popularity after the Declaration of Independence was signed. But since the mid-nineteenth century, â€Å"inalienable† has been the standard spelling. Unalienable vs. Inalienable Oddly, though, this controversy could have been avoided. This is because the spelling â€Å"inalienable† appears in other drafts of the Declaration of Independence, including Thomas Jefferson’s original draft. It was only when John Adams made a copy in his own handwriting that â€Å"unalienable† first appeared. And it was used in the final version, kick-starting a spelling debate that survives to the current day. A Tale of Two Prefixes: Un- vs. In- Why, then, has â€Å"inalienable† won out? In terms of meaning, the prefixes un- and in- are both negations. As such, they go before a word to cancel it out or suggest its opposite. The opposite of â€Å"happy,† for example, is â€Å"unhappy.† And the opposite of â€Å"elegant† is â€Å"inelegant.† The same is true with unalienable and inalienable. But the word â€Å"alien† comes to us from Latin. And while the prefix in- also has Latin roots, un- comes from German. Nineteenth-century linguists therefore decided than in- was the better prefix for â€Å"alienable.† And since then it has stuck. Or it has in most circumstances. Even these days, when people are writing about the Declaration of Independence, many prefer the spelling â€Å"unalienable.† So this mixture of a German prefix and a Latin word stem has a place in American English even today. Summary: Inalienable or Unalienable? As set out above, both of these words mean â€Å"can’t be taken away.† However, each spelling has its own place in modern English: Inalienable is the standard spelling of this term in most contexts. Unalienable is a rare variant of â€Å"inalienable,† but you can use it when quoting from or discussing the Declaration of Independence. Hopefully, this has settled some of your Independence Day spelling questions. But if you need any more help with your writing, feel free to send us a document for proofreading today.